Rice consumption in the Philippines has shifted significantly over the past seven decades because of population growth, dietary substitution, statistical methodologies and policy choices.
While the country was self-sufficient in rice from the 1960s through the 1990s, the turn of the millennium marked a structural shift toward deficits and import dependence.
This paper reviews historical consumption and production data, examines the methodological basis of per capita rice consumption estimates and discusses flaws in the Supply Utilization Accounts (SUA) method. By reconciling statistical overestimation with actual consumption patterns, the study identifies the roots of over-importation and proposes policy options that combine demand management, yield improvement and diversification of staple diets.
Introduction
Rice is not merely a staple food in the Philippines. It is a political commodity that shapes national policy, farmer livelihoods and household food security.
Historical data show that per capita rice consumption rose from 72.6 kilograms in 1960 to 92.6 kilograms in 1995, when the country remained self-sufficient with a self-sufficiency ratio (SSR) of 110% (Table 1).
By the early 2000s, however, consumption estimates had surpassed 100 kilograms per capita, reaching 119 kilograms from 2008 to 2010. This increase, combined with population growth and stagnant land area, transformed the Philippines into a structural rice importer.
At the same time, import liberalization under the Rice Tariffication Law, or Republic Act No. 11203, high fertilizer costs, continued land conversion and climate shocks such as a super El Niño have converged to depress farmgate palay prices and prompt farmers to stop planting.
© Copyright 2025 The SSResource Media.
All rights reserved.